Dawn Images

Here are the opening lines of Pakistani-American Daniyal Mueenuddin’s new novel This Is Where the Serpent Lives:

“Bayazid never knew how he came to be a little boy alone in the streets of Rawalpindi. He had a memory more of forces than of people — a crowd, a hand, a hand no more. Yet the bazaars in those early 1950s were not so crowded as that, and Rawalpindi, a town small enough that a lost little boy should be found.”

Those sentences tell you almost everything about the book’s method. The first line is plain, almost a documentary. A boy alone. A city named. No drama. Then, the second sentence slips inward. Not people, but forces. Not faces, but pressure. A crowd. A hand. Then, the hand is gone. The language enacts what it describes. Memory thins. What remains is sensation rather than story.

The third sentence is where the knife turns. The adult voice intrudes, quietly correcting the child’s recollection. The bazaar was not that crowded. Rawalpindi was small enough that a lost child should have been found. The implication is unbearable in its restraint. If he was not found, perhaps he was not lost. Perhaps he was abandoned.

From this first paragraph, Mueenuddin is telling us that power in this world will not announce itself loudly. It will work through absence, through what fails to happen. The boy is not struck, not chased, not spectacularly harmed. He is simply not retrieved. And the rest of the book will follow the consequences of that small, devastating fact.

Mueenuddin’s first novel arrives already shadowed by the acclaim that greeted his story collection In Other Rooms, Other Wonders. It does not retreat from the terrain that made his reputation. It expands it. What he offers is not a single dramatic arc but a social anatomy, a patient examination of how power is inherited and enforced across decades in Pakistan. The result is neither melodrama nor polemic, but a grave, clear-eyed study of how people live inside systems that modernise without ever truly changing.

The book announces its ambitions at once. It opens with a list of principal characters, complete with birthdates, educations and careers. Some studied abroad. Others emerge from the bazaars and fields of Punjab. At the book’s moral centre stands Yazid, also called Bayazid, first encountered as a small boy alone in a Rawalpindi bazaar in the mid-1950s. He is barefoot, holding a pair of cheap plastic shoes, and does not remember how he came to be abandoned.

Taken in by a tea-stall owner, he grows up among regulars who teach him to read and to watch people carefully. Yazid is bright, sociable, physically imposing, and a natural intermediary between classes. Over time, he becomes a driver and fixer for powerful families, respected but never secure, indispensable yet never equal.

Around Yazid, Mueenuddin builds the novel in four interlinked movements, each advancing in time and shifting perspective. The first traces Yazid’s apprenticeship in a world where hierarchy is absorbed almost instinctively. The second centres on Rustom, a young landowner educated in America who returns in the 1980s to revive an estate his father neglected. Rustom arrives with ideas shaped by his years abroad. He believes in reform and legality. Yet, the countryside he re-enters is governed by older logics.

The third movement turns inwards, into the marriage of Hisham Atar and his wife, Shahnaz. They are members of the elite, owners of farms and factories, equally at home in Lahore and London. Their courtship began in America, where Shahnaz was first involved with Hisham’s gentler brother. She chose Hisham instead, opting for Pakistan and the closer proximity to power that choice entailed. Mueenuddin renders their relationship without sentimentality.

The novel’s final and longest section follows Saqib, a servant’s son raised on the Atars’ estate and mentored by Yazid. Bright and ambitious, Saqib is taken into the household as a kind of project. He learns quickly, anticipating needs, absorbing the manners of power. When he is given responsibility for a section of farmland, he experiments with modern agriculture.

The venture is profitable. But Saqib wants more than success within the system. He wants independence. His attempt to step beyond the role assigned to him drives the novel toward its bleakest reckoning. The outcome feels structurally inevitable. The system tolerates small ambition. It does not forgive miscalculation.

What binds these narratives is not plot but a shared moral climate. Mueenuddin’s Pakistan is a place where modernisation coexists with feudal logic, where old hierarchies are not dismantled but retooled.

Mueenuddin’s style reinforces this vision. His prose is spare, exact, rarely ornamental. A drink of water tastes as if it “had electricity in it.” A face is sketched in a few strokes that carry both physical and moral weight. Critics have compared him to Chekhov, and the likeness is instructive. Like Chekhov, he is attentive to how people are shaped by circumstance and custom, by small accidents that alter a life without announcing themselves as turning points. A phone call not made, a device newly owned, a glance misread can redirect a fate. Yet, the novel is not merely sociological. Its power lies in the intimacy of its scenes.

Mueenuddin understands the emotional economy of servitude, how affection, resentment, gratitude and calculation coexist in relationships that are never equal. The guarded marriage of Hisham and Shahnaz carries weight without tipping into melodrama. Even moments of dry humour deepen rather than soften the portrait.

This Is Where the Serpent Lives is more expansive and more assured than the stories that first established Mueenuddin’s reputation. If there is a reservation to be voiced, it may be that Mueenuddin’s control is almost too complete. The novel is composed with such steadiness that one occasionally wonders what his voice might sound like if it allowed itself more disorder, more risk.

Yet, that very discipline is also the source of its authority. The book refuses easy villains and easy consolations. It does not sentimentalise suffering, nor does it flatter the reader with moral comfort.

In the end, This Is Where the Serpent Lives offers something rarer than topical relevance. It provides a layered portrait of a society in motion. It asks how people make choices inside systems that reward compromise and punish deviation. Quietly and patiently, it makes visible the structures that shape lives, then steps back, leaving the reader to reckon with what has been seen.

Originally published in Dawn, Books & Authors, February 1st, 2026