Images

Are the National Awards uniting Bollywood or dividing it?

Are the National Awards uniting Bollywood or dividing it?

Amitabh and Kangana win big but what about regional cinema?
29 Mar, 2016

The 63rd National Film Awards were announced today; while Amitabh Bachchan bagged the Best Actor accolade for his role in Piku, the Best Actress award went to Kangana Ranaut for Tanu Weds Manu Returns.

S.S. Rajamouli’s mammoth period production Baahubali was declared the Best Feature Film while Bajrangi Bhaijaan won the Best Popular Film award.

Tamil star Samuthirakani picked up the Best Supporting Actor award for Visaranaai, a thriller based on the novel Lock Up by M. Chandrakumar. Tanvi Azmi won the Best Supporting Actress award for Bajirao Mastani, while the film’s director, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, bagged the Best Director award.

The prestigious awards — announced by a jury set up by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry — are given away by the President. You can find a full list of winners here.

While Bajrangi Bhaijaan's director, Kabir Khan calls them "the only relevant awards left today in the country", not many share the same sentiment.

No recognition for regional cinema?

When the same commercial Hindi box-office hits that won big at Filmfare or Stardust end up also winning big at the National Awards, it hits a nerve. A platform that is meant to offer nationwide recognition for regional language films clearly fell short.

Director Gurvinder Singh, whose internationally acclaimed Punjabi film Chauthi Koot has been honoured with a National Film Award calls the awards a "complete farce."

"All the art films have been neglected this time. Overall, all the awards have gone to Bollywood," he says.

While Bollywood did hijack the bigger awards, even then, the National Awards are an annual reminder that Indian cinema is more than just Bollywood. If there are prizes given to gargantuan mainstream productions such as Bajirao Mastani, indie flicks like Masaan and Visaranai were also lauded and that is a step in the right direction.

New year, same winners

While there's no doubt about the fact that Kangana is an excellent actress, is it fair that she won the Best Actress award this year as well, after sweeping it up last year for Queen, making it her third NA in total?

Bhansali doesn't seem to think so wholeheartedly: “Kangana is an outstanding actress but deep in my heart, I wished Deepika or Priyanka had won. Deepika’s performance was splendid and Priyanka was fantastic too."

While we loved Deepika's heartwrenching performance in Bajirao, can we say that Ranaut didn't deserve her award? Not quite. Hey, weirder things have happened at the National Awards! Remember when Saif Ali Khan walked away with the Best Actor trophy for Hum Tum?

As with every single award, one can argue the choice of the winner in a few categories; maybe it's just time for all other players to step up their game and figure out what Kangana is doing because it seems to be working out for her!

Comments

Nikhil Manuel Mar 29, 2016 03:56pm
I am surprised Marathi films got few awards. There were so many great Marathi films (content wise), hardly any Marathi films featured in top awards. No mention of Natasamrat, Katyar Kaljaat Ghusali, Highway
Recommend
Arka Mar 29, 2016 04:32pm
bad jury....BM or BB dont deserve national award.what about Ottal,kothanodi etc?
Recommend
ahmad Mar 29, 2016 04:58pm
crap like Bahuballi won the best award?? odd
Recommend
Tomasz K. Mar 29, 2016 05:45pm
Kangna deserves every bit of that award. She was splended in TWM-R.
Recommend
filmy Mar 29, 2016 06:13pm
Visaranaai deserve best film award not bahubali.Bahubali deserve most popular film award not bajrangi bhaijan.no bengali,marathi ,malayalam film this year?they always dominate. well,i am happy manipuri film doing well. my top four -Visaranaai (Tamil),Thithi (kannada), Masaan,angry indian godesses,
Recommend
Madhusudan Mar 29, 2016 06:43pm
I was expecting nana patekar to win award for his marathi film, natasamraat, what a brilliant performance.
Recommend
kunal uke Mar 29, 2016 09:05pm
Indian cinema makes 1500 movies per year in 22 different languages. some of them are just outstanding. at the end of the day u cannot give happiness to everyone by distributing 22 national awards. some movies and people will surely left out.
Recommend
Sreenivasarajiv Mar 29, 2016 09:44pm
First of all it is internal matter of India. National award of which country ? India. And Bollywood is also regarded as regional when you are in India. India is vast and so as the diversity. Bollywood's region is Hindi belt, whereas Tamil, Telugu, Kannada,Malayalam (four south States) produce quality films too in their respective region. Tamil market is only less than Bollywood in fewer magnitude. Bahubali is awarded for visual effects.
Recommend
charu Mar 29, 2016 11:50pm
i cant believe natsamrat or katyar kaaljat ghusli dint win!!!! absolute masterpieces ...especially natsamrat although i dont understand marathi, the performances dint need any translatio at all... useless awards
Recommend
Indian Mar 30, 2016 10:40am
ya i agree it needs a debate
Recommend
Nasser Mar 30, 2016 10:46am
Indian film a awards arre sham. Mostly traded . Lacks credibility.
Recommend
sudhir Mar 30, 2016 02:20pm
If the judges of the awards had considered movies in Tamil, Malayalam, Kannada and Marathi not even a single bollywood movie or star would have got the awards.
Recommend
Ashish Mar 30, 2016 04:55pm
@charu I think Natsamarat would be next year entry it released in jan 2016. dont loose hope
Recommend
the Hindu Mar 31, 2016 12:29am
Awards to Bahubali were expected, maybe mot in the best film category but special effects and music category of course. Though I think Manjhi: The Mountain Man should've gotten the best film award.
Recommend