Images

We like to think we’re a better judge of talent than Fawad Khan — and that’s the problem

From Humaira Arshad’s comments to online outrage, everyone suddenly thinks they know more about music than Khan.
Updated 23 Oct, 2025

This argument’s been done to death. Fawad Khan was a singer before he became an actor. He was the frontman of one of Pakistan’s most popular rock bands of the 2000s, Entity Paradigm (EP). Gen Z didn’t know that, but now they probably do. The curious case of Fawad Khan is not so curious anymore — and by all means, Humaira Arshad should’ve thought before speaking.

The former playback singer, during an appearance on Suno TV’s Suno Tou Sahi, weighed in on the online criticism surrounding Khan’s place on the Pakistan Idol panel, arguing that people without formal music training shouldn’t be judging such a competition. Her words were clear — if you can’t demonstrate a taan, you shouldn’t be judging one.

On paper, that may sound fair. But in practice, it reeks of sour grapes — or perhaps a misplaced nostalgia for a world where the only valid way to learn music was to sit cross-legged before an ustad. That world, for better or worse, doesn’t exist anymore. The shagirdgi tradition has faded, music schools are few and far between, and the Pakistan Idol stage represents the masses — raw, untrained, self-taught voices finding their way through instinct, YouTube tutorials, and pure passion.

And if that’s the case, who better than someone like Fawad Khan to sit on that panel? His journey mirrors the very spirit of the show. He may not have formal training, but he’s lived the music, belting out ‘Kahan Hay Tu’, ‘Waqt’ and ‘Hamesha’ in sweaty underground gigs when autotune wasn’t even a thing. Sure, there were moments in his best songs where he faltered, but he made a name for himself regardless, which says a lot about talent, persistence, and connection.

So, perhaps it makes perfect sense to have Khan sitting alongside Rahat Fateh Ali Khan, Zeb Bangash and Bilal Maqsood, all of whom represent very different musical traditions. Rahat brings classical mastery, Zeb, who is also classically trained, offers multilingual sensitivity, Bilal lends pop sensibility and industry insight, and Khan embodies the perspective of the artist who made it big outside the rules. If anything, this balance makes for a richer, more rounded panel. Because when the audience is mostly self-taught, the judging panel should reflect that spectrum too, from the trained to the intuitive.

This isn’t even the first time Pakistan Idol has done this. Bushra Ansari, for instance, was a judge on Pakistan Idol season 1. She could sing beautifully, but her fame didn’t come from a formal musical career. Much like Khan, her place on the panel was justified by her artistic versatility and deep connection to Pakistani entertainment.

Across the border, Indian Idol hasn’t always been purist either — for every classically trained Sonu Nigam or Shreya Ghoshal, there’s been an Anu Malik, whose biggest asset was his knack for pop hooks and an instinctive understanding of what the masses wanted.

That’s the global Idol formula — you mix technical expertise with popular appeal, because talent shows aren’t conservatories, they’re about entertainment, emotion, and relatability. And when the entire point is to discover new voices, you need judges who represent different kinds of musical journeys, not just one rigid standard of “training.”

Of course, there’s also the attention economy at play. Having Khan on the panel is a masterstroke from a marketing perspective. His global fame pulls in audiences who might never otherwise tune into a singing competition. The same logic applies to every Idol franchise worldwide, from American Idol’s revolving door of superstar judges to Indian Idol’s mix of legends and pop-culture magnets. Star power brings visibility; visibility brings opportunity, for contestants and networks alike.

But beyond the ratings game, there’s something to be said for why we’re so obsessed with policing Khan’s career moves. Whether it was the Aabeer Gulaal controversy or now Pakistan Idol, we seem determined to dissect every choice he makes. Maybe that says less about him and more about us, a nation perpetually suspicious of its own success stories.

Perhaps it’s time we stopped pretending we’re better judges of talent than Khan. Because if anything, Pakistan Idol has shown that talent isn’t confined to classrooms or ragas, it’s in the untrained, unpolished voices that rise despite not having the right teacher or the right lineage. And that’s precisely the kind of talent Khan has been.

Comments

faisal siddiqui Oct 23, 2025 02:40pm
when you judge or examine something, wheteher its a game, art, poetry, act/crime, sports or even academics ... there has to be a set of rules and possibly a given outline (syllabi). and thats where formal teaching or music schools chips in... Without basics , its just a hearsay. Fawad dosnt sits in this equation.
Recommend
K Niaz Oct 23, 2025 02:48pm
I think it is only in Pakistan a self taught person, in this case Music, can become a master or a judge. And they can be lauded for that. I live in a country where music (reading and writing) is a subject in schools, children learn symphonies, and the music composers have PhD in music. So from that context the arguments are pretty flimsy to say the least.
Recommend
RhythmWaves Oct 23, 2025 03:00pm
Just like in Cricket we all think we are allrounder s:), reality is just opposite of this narrative ....
Recommend
IA Oct 23, 2025 03:45pm
Nice effort!
Recommend
Zishan Oct 23, 2025 04:12pm
Fawad Khan is no talent. He cant even come up with a new song.
Recommend
Babar M Oct 23, 2025 04:42pm
That’s precisely why there’re always multiple judges. Judging is a collective decision, with each judge looking for a certain aspect of the contest in a participant. Have you not seen 80 year old male judges grading female gymnasts at the Olympics? One doesn’t have to be a meteorologist to tell if it is raining.
Recommend
Alifia Oct 23, 2025 07:01pm
Well-written. Well-put.
Recommend
Hussain Mansoor Oct 23, 2025 07:04pm
Fawad khan in india is only knows as a quintissential chocolate hero of Pakistan, but look what he has done in his career, the guy was a lead singer in a succesful band, he has acted in movies, in TV drama, if someone should be a judge of talent, Its Fawad Khan
Recommend
Leon Menezes Oct 23, 2025 07:20pm
Well said
Recommend
Abdul Basit Oct 23, 2025 10:26pm
Judges should be "well-trained" in whatever they are judging. Period.
Recommend
Dr. Salaria, Aamir Ahmad Oct 24, 2025 11:10am
To be a judge in any matter is not easy.
Recommend
Ayesha Riaz Oct 24, 2025 01:28pm
Fawad Khan’s fame as a rock frontman and TV star doesn’t make him fit to judge Pakistan Idol. Popularity and acting chops aren’t substitutes for mastery of pitch; tone; rhythm; or vocal technique. A credible judge must have deep; formal grounding in music not just a famous face and good lighting. Khan’s lack of musical training exposes the industry’s obsession with celebrity over craft. By glorifying unqualified judges; we tell young singers that exposure beats expertise; and charm trumps discipline. His brief; fading Bollywood venture only highlights limited range and staying power. Success in a small; insulated market doesn’t equate to artistic excellence. Add whispers of arrogance; misdemenour and poor mentorship; and the irony deepens how can one inspire growth while embodying indifference? Idol should elevate credible musicians; not reinforce mediocrity dressed as star power. Pakistan’s industry must reclaim respect for skill; study; and genuine artistry or sink beneath its own hype.
Recommend
Hash Oct 24, 2025 01:29pm
And those Phds then sit on entertainment tv shows judging panels? This is an entertainment show that generates its revenue from views. It employs celebrities to aid in getting those views. If it was a reality show about a day in the life of a teacher marking music exams or examining practical sessions in a degree course then definitely Fawad or any other celebrity would not have warranted a place.
Recommend
Samina Idris Oct 24, 2025 01:33pm
Fawad Khan’s charm and celebrity can’t mask his glaring lack of musical authority. Being a former rock frontman and TV heartthrob doesn’t make him fit to judge Pakistan Idol it makes him a marketing gimmick. He’s a performer, not a pedagogue, with no formal training in pitch, tone, or rhythm, yet somehow deemed qualified to appraise real singers. This isn’t mentorship, it’s theater. Idol needs judges who can dissect a note, not pose for cameras. Khan’s short lived Bollywood foray proved his limits he neither conquered acting nor contributed musically. Back home, he floats on fame in a shallow pool, mistaken for depth. Elevating him signals that polish trumps practice and ego passes for expertise. Add reports of arrogance, misdemenour towards senior veteran actor and you have a judge more likely to deflate ambition than refine it. Pakistan’s talent scene deserves craftsmen, not celebrities allergic to critique. Idol’s credibility dies when art bows to image and Khan is the poster boy of that decay.
Recommend
Syed Hasni Oct 24, 2025 02:52pm
So did Einstein, “If I were not a physicist, I would probably be a musician. I often think in music. I live my daydreams in music. I see my life in terms of music.” ― Albert Einstein
Recommend
Ahad Oct 24, 2025 05:57pm
@K Niaz - Everh country regardless of where you’re from has traditional musical training and traditions but that does not mean that is the way only way to become a musician. If anything, this person who is self-taught has more versatility to offer than the other 3 panelists provided they are classically trained.
Recommend
Sailani Oct 24, 2025 11:20pm
So true.
Recommend