Images

Karachi court sentences director Jami to two years in jail for defaming fellow director Sohail Javed

Karachi court sentences director Jami to two years in jail for defaming fellow director Sohail Javed

He has been taken to the Karachi Central Jail to serve out his sentence.
Updated 08 Jul, 2025

A Karachi additional sessions court sentenced on Tuesday director Jamshed Mahmood Raza, popularly known as Jami, to two years in jail for defaming fellow director Sohail Javed in 2019. He has been taken to the Karachi Central Jail to serve his sentence, his lawyer has confirmed.

The case involved a letter Jami read out from an anonymous sexual assault survivor at the Lahooti Melo, a festival held in Jamshoro that focused on the #MeToo movement in its theme, and also posted to his Facebook page.

The letter that Jami read out was from an unnamed survivor who described being assaulted by a very well-known figure in the entertainment industry but did not name the alleged abuser. Jami didn’t name the alleged abuser in his Facebook post either. However, Javed argued that in the comment section of the post, many people guessed it was him and Jami did nothing to stop the speculation or deny the accusation.

He said the letter contained “specific references” such as referring to the alleged abuser as a “music video and TVC director”, saying “he was a panellist at a festival in Hyderabad”, “he introduced his 23 or 24-year-old son to me, who worked in the same profession as mine” and “descriptions of personal stories shared by the alleged predator [that] led people to believe that [Javed] is the subject of the accusation.” He argued that this caused irreparable damage to his reputation.

The case was filed in 2019. In February that year, Javed served Jami a legal notice asking him to tender an “unconditional public apology on the same/equal forum” which was used to publish the letter.

Jami’s legal team responded to the notice on March 9 denying the accusations. The same day, Javed filed a defamation lawsuit against Jami, asking for the aforementioned posts to be removed as well as Rs500 million in damages and Rs500 million for mental torture.

Jami denied the accusations of defamation and said the letter was handed to him by the organiser of the Lahooti Melo and he did not know the content at the time of reading it. “He stated that after posting the video, other users began naming the complainant in the comments. He alleged that he neither named the complainant nor intended to defame him. Upon seeing his name in the comments, he stated that he delated the post and even deactivated his Facebook account,” read the judgment issued by the additional sessions judge. The judgment was reached after several court hearings over the course of the past few years.

“He presented himself as an activist and producer who acted without malicious intent and asserted that the complainant [Javed] had, at some stage, ‘forgiven’ the individuals on whose insistence the letter was read.”

The court observed that these defences lacked “evidentiary backing” and that Jami did not “produce the letter’s author, any communication with the Lahooti Melo organisers or any credible evidence to show that he was unaware of the content beforehand”.

“More importantly, he failed to clarify why, despite recognising the emerging misidentification, he continued to repost and respond to comments in a way that exacerbated the imputation. His alleged act of deleting the post, assuming it occurred after the damage, does not exonerate him of liability. Notably, he also refused to be examined on oath or lead any evidence in defence.”

Jami has been convicted under Section 500 (defamation) of the Pakistan Penal Code. He has been sentenced to an imprisonment of two years and a fine of Rs10,000.

Comments

SacredDiscourse Jul 08, 2025 11:06pm
The predator wins, thanks to our esteemed judicial system that punishes victims
Recommend
Dr. Salaria, Aamir Ahmad Jul 09, 2025 12:38am
Speculation is not reality.
Recommend
Razzak Loya. Jul 09, 2025 01:34am
Interesting! Be careful on Social Media. Read , don't write.
Recommend
Ron Jul 09, 2025 04:35am
this is unbelievable that the Sex offender is not arrested or investigated
Recommend
Ivana Jul 09, 2025 07:19am
What kinda s*** lawyer couldn't defend this case?
Recommend
Denzel Jul 09, 2025 07:44am
He'll probably be out soon on bail
Recommend
Laila Jul 09, 2025 06:59pm
@Ivana The kind who is either incompetent, not a real lawyer (degrees are for sale in Pakistan) or somebody who is colluding with the prosecution (not uncommon in our corrupt judicial system). Defamations cases in Pakistan are often used to silence opposite, rivals, threats, dissent. This is one of such cases.
Recommend
Laila Jul 09, 2025 07:01pm
@Ron Careful now. You can be traced. Even digitally. There is no conviction.Also it's Pakistan. Rule of corruption. A safe haven for sexual predators, molesters, abusers and honor killers.
Recommend
Laila Jul 09, 2025 07:03pm
@Denzel This was a sentencing. Not a hearing. No room for bail unless he appeals and the case goe back on trial. He is going to jail for 2 years. That's how convictions work. Up until a conviction and guilty verdict it is up to the court to decide whether bail is granted or not. After conviction it's game over.
Recommend
js Jul 09, 2025 10:03pm
Jail is a strange punishment for defamation. Jail is for those people who are a physical or serious financial harm to society, not for defaming one person. Can any lawmakers reading this consider changing the punishment for this to a purely financial penance?
Recommend
Jawaid Shaikh Jul 10, 2025 01:04am
In UAE this offence of accusing another is taken far from seriously. If there was any truth to the content of the letter, the lady accusor should come forward, remember if an accusation is true, there is no malice, no malice truth telling us not illegal
Recommend
zahid mallah Jul 10, 2025 11:03am
If it is all proved defamation act .....then such kind of sentences should be for all who malign political opponents
Recommend
Rashida Masood Jul 10, 2025 12:18pm
Unfair conviction and unfair sentence. He did not name the director who was said to have committed sexual assault. Too long a sentence in any case - even if the accuse admitted he let the person be named . Why not catch those who actually named him? 30 days should be the absolute maximum...en though that would not be justified.
Recommend
Laila Jul 10, 2025 01:52pm
For people who don't understand law or this case: If I make a comment under an article, where I say "X is a murderer/Human Trafficker/Rapist/Robber/Drug Addict", should Images/Dawn be held responsible for that? If your answer is NO, then you understand the case. If your answer is Yes, then you don't understand the case. Look up defamation.
Recommend
Laila Jul 10, 2025 01:59pm
Only in Pakistan can a law be misconstrued and misused like this. If this is defamation, then hell has just frozen over. This is scapegoating, censorship and persecution. This is an exercise in how we silence dissent and victims. This is another day in the criminal safe haven of Pakistan where justice doesn't exist and corruption rules. Another win for corruption. Jami must appeal his case and this ridiculous verdict.
Recommend
Laila Jul 10, 2025 03:53pm
@Jawaid Shaikh Nobody was accused. That's the crux of it all. The director Sohail Javed himself put his name out there by starting this case. Defamation is based on the defamatory statements of one person against another, by name. In this case Jami didn't not name anybody. He read an anonymous letter from a rape victim, which also did not include any names. So there is and was no defamation. Jami is being held accountable for the comments and speculation of other people, which are not even his words. So the case is a farce. If the victim was your sister/daughter would you also expect her to waive her anonymity? The letter was anonymous. Because the person wants to stay anonymous. So no they don't need to come forward.
Recommend
A reader Jul 10, 2025 05:52pm
@ Laila, i don't think you understand the law or case here. dawn WOULD be held liable if they allowed your comment defaming someone on their platform and do not take action to remove the comment.
Recommend