Images

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's home renovations cost $3 million

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's home renovations cost $3 million

Buckingham Palace detailed how the royal family had spent money provided by taxpayers.
26 Jun, 2019

The cost of renovating Prince Harry and his wife Meghan’s new home was $3 million, Buckingham Palace said on Tuesday as it detailed how the royal family had spent money provided by taxpayers.

The sum, part of the annual “Sovereign Grant”, funded the conversion of Frogmore Cottage to a single dwelling while the royal couple, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, paid for the fittings and furnishings.

“The property had not been subject of work for some years and had already been earmarked for renovation in line with out responsibility to maintain the condition of the occupied royal palaces estate,” said Michael Stevens, the Keeper of the Privy Purse and responsible for royal accounts.

“Outdated infrastructure was replaced to guarantee the long term future of the property,” he said ahead of the publication of the Sovereign Grant report which details official income and expenditure of Queen Elizabeth and her household.

The 19th century Frogmore Cottage, in the grounds of the queen’s Windsor Castle estate, became the official residence of Harry and Meghan when they moved in shortly before the birth of their first child, Archie, in May.

The building had been previously converted into five separate residences and royal officials had already planned to renovate it before it was agreed that it would become the residence of Harry and Meghan.

The six-month refurbishment included new electrical wiring, replacement of defective ceiling beams and floor joists, new heating systems and the introduction of new gas and water mains.

A palace source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the taxpayer grant covered the basic cost for kitchens, bathrooms and flooring with additional outlays for anything more bespoke being met privately by the royals who also paid for items such as curtains and furnishings.

British newspapers have reported that among the changes, the cottage now has a “floating floor” and a yoga studio.

Work has been “substantially” completed and outstanding renovations would not feature in next year’s annual report, meaning the cost would be under the 350,000 pound threshold to be included in the public report.

The queen was very involved in the decision to allow the couple to use Frogmore Cottage and had been kept informed of the progress of the project throughout, the source said.

Harry, 34, and Meghan, 37, had been living in a residence in the grounds of Kensington Palace, the London home of his elder brother Prince William and his wife Kate.

But since their marriage in May last year, they have been forging their own path, separating their household from William and Kate’s and relocating their staff to Buckingham Palace. Last week, it was announced that they were splitting from the charitable foundation the two couples had shared.

The outlay on Frogmore Cottage formed part of the 82.2 million pound Sovereign Grant, the government handout which covers the official duties of Queen Elizabeth including staffing costs, upkeep of royal palaces and travel expenses.

It is based on 15 per cent of surplus revenue from the Crown Estate, a property portfolio belonging to the monarchy, from two years previously. In 2016, this percentage was raised to 25 percent for a decade with the extra set aside to pay for an ongoing major overhaul of Buckingham Palace.

That 10-year 369 million-pound upgrade work to replace aging electrical wiring and heating systems at the palace was on track, Stevens said.

Graham Smith, from Republic which wants to abolish the monarchy, said his campaign group estimated the real cost of the royal family each year was 345 million pounds.

“If even one school or hospital is facing cuts we cannot justify spending a penny on the royals,” he said. “Yet with all public services under intense financial pressure we throw 2.4 million pounds at a new house for Harry.”

Comments

Newborn Jun 26, 2019 12:55pm
But both of them probably generate billions in revenues for the media and tourist companies - same applies for the entire Royal family. If it were in America, they'd be billionaires just through royalties.
Recommend
hyderabadi Jun 26, 2019 01:13pm
Lazy fellows. Better do some work and contribute to humanity
Recommend
Mahmood Jun 26, 2019 02:21pm
@Newborn: "If it were in America, they'd be billionaires just through royalties." Royalties, earning Royalties!!
Recommend
Anti-Corruption_Pakistani Jun 26, 2019 04:20pm
In my view, UK's tax payers money wasted that could had been spent more wisely in other welfare projects. Would both Harry and Meghan have spent £2.4 millions from their own pocket?
Recommend
putho madre Jun 26, 2019 04:50pm
People who live on peoples' hard earned money.
Recommend
Daskalos Jun 27, 2019 12:03am
Very lavish and wasteful expenses by a second class royal who is only number 6th in the line of succession. HM the Queen should send this case to NAB Pakistan for investigation and recovery from Harry and Meghan. Maybe Jemima Goldsmith can help with some 'sifarish ' in the right quarters?
Recommend
Daskalos Jun 27, 2019 12:03am
@putho madre yes. Very familiar types in Pakistan.
Recommend
Jung Jun 27, 2019 09:47am
Get a real job rather than wasting taxpayers money.
Recommend
tushar Jun 27, 2019 12:26pm
This Frogmore cottage has an Indian past as it was gifted by Queen Victoria to her trusted and loyal Indian Diwan as his residence and remained his property for several decades until it was again bought over by the Royal family.
Recommend
Joe Kapinski-West Bloomfield, USA Jun 29, 2019 03:27pm
How much more will it cost to the British taxpayer in order to import fried chicken, water melon and kool aid from America for breakfast everyday for the Royal Duchess?
Recommend