Dawn Images

At first glance, Case No. 9 may appear to be another familiar story: a woman assaulted by a powerful man and her long, bruising pursuit of justice. But to stop there would be to miss what the drama does differently — and why it has sparked sustained conversation rather than fleeting outrage. Its real intervention lies in how its women characters reshape what mainstream television allows women to be.

Focusing on their strength while playing pivotal roles is fundamental to decoding why Case No. 9 cannot be a one-off investment for TV producers, channel owners and mainstream scriptwriters. Gone are the days when screenwriters can claim that Pakistani and South Asian audiences only love the roti-dhoti mazlum aurat (damsel in distress).

For decades (after PTV’s golden era), drama writers have conveniently blamed audiences, skewed primetime ratings and TV channels for the pathetic portrayal of suffering women in Urdu dramas — a convenient cover-up for lazy, regressive and under-researched storytelling. The subliminal messaging carried by each of these women characters in Case No. 9 signals the change most millennials have been ranting about.

Saba Qamar Zaman as Seher Moazzam

Arguably one of the strongest roles in Pakistani mainstream television, Saba Qamar’s embodiment of Seher as a highly educated middle-class working woman has won hearts through a character who commands respect and justice on merit. Not only does her character break ground as a divorced family breadwinner, but she also explores uncharted grey areas in emotional and psychological complexity.

Seher is vulnerable yet a fighter; broken yet resilient; shattered yet collected. Saba’s portrayal steers women’s representation away from flat binaries: the modern, lacklustre vamp (Verdah Aziz as Fariya in Meri Zindagi Hai Tu) or the innocent, defenceless damsel-in-distress (Mahira Khan as Mehreen in Hum Kahan Ke Sacche Thay).

Even though Seher is purely fictional, the character feels believable because of its clearly defined arc. She begins as someone unable to defy her family or even open locked doors — literally and figuratively — to go to the police station, but culminates as someone unafraid to walk the streets alone or confront her perpetrator across the courtroom, newsroom and social media. Seher articulates, rather than sledgehammers, several potent and memorable lessons:

She corrects the misnomer “rape victim” by repeatedly asserting that she is a “rape survivor”; urges her neighbourhood to “raise their sons better” instead of policing their daughters; reminds viewers that religion does not teach married women to blindly support their husbands in unjust matters; and underscores that even a man without a proven problematic past is not absolved of a heinous crime like rape.

Aamina Sheikh as Beenish Ali

Making a stellar comeback as Barrister Beenish Ali after a hiatus of seven years, Aamina Sheikh proves she is very much here to stay — and slay. Beenish is a barrister who runs her own firm and leads a team of assistants. Unlike most television characters, we never learn about Beenish’s personal life. There are no distracting backstories, marital subplots or unnecessary family arcs to dilute her singular purpose: fighting for her client, Seher.

When hearing Seher’s case, Beenish never questions why Seher went to Kamran’s house or why she was out late at night, nor does she make false promises. Her dialogues and legal arguments reinforce a crucial point: it does not matter whether a woman is married or unmarried, dating or divorced, monogamous or polygamous, virgin or sexually active — the only question the court should be asking is whether she was raped or not.

While audiences often crave heightened histrionics in courtroom dramas, viewers here were drawn to Beenish’s calm authority and nerves of steel, eagerly awaiting her sharp comebacks as a counterpoint to her hyper-dramatic and overconfident defence rival (Noor Ul Hassan as Bukhari Sahab). The drama would have lost much of its impact had a man been positioned as Seher’s courtroom saviour. The moment when Beenish silently glares at Bukhari Sahab while walking past him after winning the case carries the emotional weight of a hundred melodramatic, dialogue-heavy scenes.

Naveen Waqar as Manisha

In decades of consuming Pakistani dramas, it is difficult to recall a married woman fighting so relentlessly as an ally for another woman on screen — and doing so in direct opposition to her own husband. Naveen Waqar’s Manisha, a women’s rights activist, is written with grit, agency and moral clarity, even when that clarity demands a harsh stand against her spouse.

Throughout the drama, Manisha holds her husband (Junaid Khan as Rohit Bhagwat) accountable as an eyewitness to Seher’s rape. She actively helps Seher find legal representation and media visibility, and ultimately walks out of her home with her son when her husband crosses the line. Manisha emerges as a much-needed ally and friend, offering a rare portrayal of women navigating the suffocating space between personal values and marital compromise.

Notably, several scenes between Manisha, Seher and Beenish pass the Bechdel test — where two named women speak to each other about something other than a man — still an uncommon sight in mainstream Pakistani television.

A gender disruptor for mainstream television

The drama’s logline is straightforward yet gripping: Can a woman legally prove she has been raped without tangible physical or medical evidence? Its strength lies in granting women agency, professional identity and narrative authority on screen.

Ageism and sexism remain deeply entrenched in Pakistan’s television industry, where women approaching 30 are routinely relegated to behens and bhabis. It is therefore significant that the leading women helm this project in their forties while playing their real ages on screen. Their craft and longevity challenge the notion that women actors have an expiry date, proving instead that their calibre can command sustained viewership.

In a world already replete with despair, violence, and warfare, audiences understandably crave fictionalised optimism: accountability, justice and the possibility of institutional change. Whether the industry absorbs Case No. 9’s lessons — or quietly retreats to safer, more familiar formulas — remains the more telling question.