Indeed, some of the best action dramas of our time (The Wire, Sopranos, Breaking Bad and Game of Thrones to name a few) have happily killed off their most loved characters. I think this is part of the reason why these shows keep us hooked. Action dramas are just so much better when the risk of death is not just inevitable but also credible.
Real life doesn’t come in a self-contained sugarcoated package. Not only do the creators of Sacred Games understand this, they also trust their audience’s intelligence. They know today’s audience has a lot to choose from and because of this we are both a sophisticated and picky lot. We want to see real life, real stories and real people mimicked on our screens. We don’t want watered down half-truths.
The Sacred Games gives us just that.
Sacred Games is paced well but it isn't perfect Another reason the show works well is because it’s styled as an eight-hour long series instead of the typical three-hour Bollywood film.
Technically, given the plot and cast of the show, The Sacred Games could’ve been a movie. But by spreading the action across eight hours, the audience gets more refined and artistically realised character and plot development that just isn’t possible on the big screen.
And perhaps because there are no time constraints or for that matter no censor board constraints, the show doesn’t have to hold back.
Instead, the creators dive deep into the nitty-gritties of Mumbai’s corruption, elitism, nepotism and sexism.
From insinuations of corruption within Indian NGOs, state agencies including RAW and the police and even within Bollywood, the show doesn’t trade in subtleties.
Of course, not holding back doesn’t mean that everything is necessary.
The last 10 minutes of the final episode (typically when a most crucial cliffhanger needs to happen) definitely left a lot to be desired.
Kind of like the complaint I have with the bit family drama This Is Us , the final episode felt redundant, almost as if it was circling its goal and unnecessarily belabouring the mystery to the point that I just checked out. Which is not good because they definitely want the audience to be dying to check back in if they are wanting to be picked up for a second season.
Another problem I had with the show was that some things felt like they were just said or done with almost no follow through later on.
For instance, Radhika Apte’s character is given a big feminist moment in which she calls out her bosses at RAW for confining her to a desk job instead of letting her be a field agent because she’s a woman.
Sadly, not only does the show never again address this very pivotal point but shamelessly kills off Apte’s character within five minutes of her going into the field alone. I guess that women really are better suited for desk jobs then? It’s hard to say because the show doesn’t bother with any follow up or follow through.