In Conversation with Salima Hashmi
Farida Batool: You have greatly influenced Pakistan’s contemporary art history, and I have always wondered that though your work is generally political, yet you have never appeared to be an extremely critical person.
Salima Hashmi: I think one has to decide for oneself the aim of the critical view. Navigating one’s way through perturbing times often makes one feel like a nihilist. One has to be very clear that this swamp doesn’t swallow you up, nor others. So yes, I do agree that my work has always been very political. I view myself as a highly political being because every thing is interlinked with politics. I have never doubted for a moment that all cultural work is political work. Actually, it’s a smoke screen that protects you. I consider my politics to be about indulging in practices of intrinsic importance to humankind; ensuring its survival in ways better than how I found them. So one must keep building, which is only possible by creating friends, then those friends ensure that the idea doesn’t die.
FB: So investing in friends is a political strategy?
SH: It is. You ensure that the idea blossoms by making people capable of carrying ideas forward. I like Mao Tse-tung's statement that one should outlive one’s enemies, which doesn’t mean one’s physical self, because everyone has a certain life span. Instead, it’s about how your ideas should be strong enough that you leave your enemies behind.
FB: The ‘Personal is Political’ encompasses your curatorship, teachings, and art practice. I wonder if there is anything ‘non-political’ in terms of art?
SH: No! I think if one believes in totality of the term ‘political’, then works of art relating to intense personal experiences, or works that engage with cerebral aesthetics, may pose the question – ‘how is this political?’ But I think the work is still political, however, the notion of political may be misread. Because art is a testimony of one’s time, and is a response and outcome of certain conditions prevalent in that particular time, whether it is something as personal as a romantic relationship, or as intellectual as looking at an element in the visual arts. It speaks for all such relationships whether in the way the stone is carved in an Etruscan tomb, or the way Josef Albers makes a square within a square. Albers existed in his time and things moved because of the politics of his time. I think, having an allergy to the word ‘politics’ is shortsighted, and nor does politics have to be the ‘be all and the end all’ of how one approaches art criticism.
FB: You write in a statement for Making of Meaning that, ‘art is infested with hierarchies of gender, location, class and power’, so do you really want to eliminate these boundaries?
SH: This question has so many layers! It’s a fact that making of anything in a way that it can aspire to the label of ‘art’, is difficult to encompass. Though people who make things, write and sing certain things abound, one tends to follow a particular way of assigning the label of ‘artist’. Further, this labeling becomes more skewed because of the bugbear of consumerism, and the acquisition of art as investment. Yes, I have always wanted to break these barriers. I think that today when there is a rising middle class, when there is an elite, which does have money to spend, we are in danger of falling into the trap of not asking these critical questions. Feminist art history offers a paradigm that makes it possible to question canons and hierarchies of the art world, e.g. why should we buy art and keep it, and why should we not educate twenty-five artists instead? I think it is time to ask such questions.
FB: Making of Meaning was shown at colleges in different cities of Pakistan, whereas Desperately Seeking Paradise was curated for Dubai Art Fair. How do you see your audiences and the selection/quality of art for different locations?
SH: I think if one asks basic questions like “why one wants to share art?” or “why one wants other people to see it?” the answer invariably is, “To make other people’s lives better”. And therefore to me the question of framing audiences as local or global is almost secondary. In my curated exhibitions, I concern myself with the chemistry between the images, various objects and videos, and how these objects create a dialogue with people and a larger narrative.