Images

Review: Lahore Se Aagey is less road trip, more car crash

Review: Lahore Se Aagey is less road trip, more car crash

The film is a missed opportunity for its talented actors. Here's how
Updated 12 Nov, 2016

Here's the thing — since director Wajahat Rauf and writer Yasir Hussain threw out the rule book while making new film Lahore Se Aagey, I figured I’d do the same while reviewing it. Just gonna freestyle it.

You know, I wanted to like this movie. I really did.

I'd hoped, considering Yasir’s character Moti — the stuttering fool with a heart of gold — was the high point of its prequel Karachi Se Lahore, that Lahore Se Aagey would somehow be more enjoyable than its predecessor. I'd hoped the change of pace, fresh faces, melodies and new scenery would add up to a story that was better than that last trip.

Instead, Lahore Se Aagey, directed and produced by Wajahat Rauf, is not much more than a random collection of situations strung together with chewing gum and prayers. Let's start where the film didn’t: the plot.

Is this a road trip or just... a trip?

Lahore Se Aagey tries to pick up where things left off in Karachi Se Lahore, as Yasir’s character Moti, tries to get from Lahore to Swat to see his dying mamoo (Behroze Sabzwari).

As he sets off from Lahore, he is almost run over by the “free spirited” wannabe rockstar Taraa (Saba Qamar) who is looking to escape her confining, highly irritating tool of a boyfriend, Aly.

Meanwhile Moti’s “evil” momani (played by Rubina Ashraf) has devious plans. She dispatches two annoying assassins to stop him from laying claim to his inheritance. So it sounds like the movie is about Moti and Taraa’s quest to go north to find his fortune while staying one step ahead of dangerous assassins, right? Nope.

Unfortunately, that isn't exactly the case.

The evil assassins dispatched by Moti's momani to go after him.
The evil assassins dispatched by Moti's momani to go after him.

Instead of embodying the spirit of a road trip film by evoking a smooth sense of movement, Lahore Se Aagey feels more like a collection of short sketches thrown together with little more than hope and a prayer to bind them. We're never really told how or why Moti and Taraa end up at certain raves or village musical events. We're never told how Moti's uncle bounces back from what ails him.

This sense of superfluousness overrides the entire script. Like KSL, Lahore Se Aagey favors quick, cheap laughs over actual cohesion or character building, as though it’s been written via machine gun, spraying jokes all over the place, hoping something will stick.

Going back to blackface — really guys? Blackface is offensive for reasons that are easily available via a quick Google search for anyone who cares to be responsible.

I mean, in the span of maybe 50 minutes we go from Gawalmandi to a bus to a random tribal rave to the middle of the jungle, (with Wajahat as the tribal chief —in blackface), to the north and oh there’s a singing competition too.

And going back to blackface — really guys? Blackface is offensive for reasons that are easily available via a quick Google search for anyone who cares to be responsible. This is why you should never make a movie without adult supervision.

In 2016, we shouldn't have to explain to filmmakers why this is offensive.
In 2016, we shouldn't have to explain to filmmakers why this is offensive.

One could argue that the movie was striving to ape absurdist humour. I appreciate a good old absurdist farce as much as the next guy, but only when that's truly a movie's intention. This was aiming for mainstream comedy and only unintentionally falls into the category of the absurd.

This is evident in how the tone of the thing stumbles from parody to authenticity —shameless, schmaltzy sincerity — whenever it pleases.

This is also evident in the seemingly random directorial choices that pepper the film. I mean, breaking the 4th wall and having actors speaking directly to the audience is cute, and can be effective when done right, but in Lahore Se Aagey it's employed too spastically.

To be honest, the movie lurches from shot to shot and scene to scene like it’s been edited by an epileptic hamster on a sugar rush. Well, except for the slo-mo reaction shots.

Oh God above, please let me never see another slo-mo reaction shot, or pointless bird's eye. I mean I get that drones are cool, but is LSA's cinematographer getting a commission for every time he randomly chucks one at us?

They do seem to have better luck with the landscape shots though, since the real stars of the show are the beautiful locations.

The movie was shot in stunning locations.
The movie was shot in stunning locations.

It is occasionally breathtaking to behold, particularly when we reach the northern areas in the second half of the movie. One wishes it could’ve applied to the rest of the movie.

When good actors aren't given a chance to shine

Let’s talk about how this film lets Saba Qamar down.

Her character had potential to be the breakout performance of this movie. Instead, she's given so little to work with in terms of character development that she reaches for the overacting early on just to try and sell it. This just leaves her and Yasir on two very different tonal wavelengths.

This wouldn’t have happened if her character Taraa were given just the slightest bit of establishment, room to become, instead of merely be. Instead the inconsistent development and threadbare motivation leave her wrong-footed for most of the film. It's quite sad considering she has some moments of real charm, and the chemistry between her and Moti becomes more obvious when the movie slows down for a few precious moments following the intermission.

Yasir Hussain's Moti can’t quite hold the whole enterprise up on his own, and this is where one actually misses the ensemble of the previous movie.

The obligatory item number is also cutely dispensed within this context. The number, 'Kalaabaz Dil' though a blatant auditory and visual rip off of *Kajra Re’, is the highlight of the soundtrack. At least the actors can dance well. ‘Befiqriyaan’ is the only other song worth mentioning really. It's also probably the deepest character establishment Taara gets.

Yasir Hussain's Moti, unfortunately, is also let down. In KSL, he had a sweet, off-kilter appeal. While he retains that, he can’t quite hold the whole enterprise up on his own, and this is where one actually misses the ensemble of the previous movie, especially given how skeletal everyone else’s character is.

I will also begrudgingly accept Behroze Sabzwari as a central character, he’s quite funny as the (not) dying mamoo and gels well with both Moti and Taraa.

Behroze Sabzwari gets props for playing a real character with authentic emotion
Behroze Sabzwari gets props for playing a real character with authentic emotion

This is a shame for an actress as decent as Rubina Ashraf (as the momani) because she, like everyone else is just cameo, or worse, a stereotype, like the irritating henchmen. In fact, Abdullah Farhatullah and Wajahat should actually apologise to the Pushtun people, because that accent was atrocious.

Some of the other cameos work better than others. Chief among them is the ever-beguiling Atiqa Odho as, let's just say a courtesean. Another pleasant surprise was the return of Zeezoo (Wajahat’s son and Ayesha Omar’s little brother from the first film). Obvious nepotism aside, the kid can work the camera quite well, and one actually wishes he had been given more to do.

The rest of the cameos are less killer, more filler. I mean we get that the director is friends with Ali Zafar but what was the point?

All in all, guys Lahore Se Aagey wasn't the cinematic experience I had hoped for.

I'll admit that it looks like the LSA team had a ball making the movie, I just wish I could say I had even a quarter of the fun watching.

Rating: ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Comments

Brutal honesty Nov 12, 2016 03:43pm
Lahore se Aagey only for Lahories....
Recommend (0)
ahmad Nov 12, 2016 04:49pm
the review would have appealed more, had the response been stated clearly.
Recommend (0)
Ali S Nov 12, 2016 06:43pm
It's like a 90s Lollywood flick on steroids (but minus the paindoo charm)
Recommend (0)
Naeem Nov 12, 2016 11:55pm
Isn't that precious..
Recommend (0)
A shah Nov 13, 2016 12:05am
It was a painful and enduring experience trying to sit through the full film without cringing and nodding off.
Recommend (0)
Ehsan Nov 13, 2016 12:40am
Once the reviewer starts reviewing the movie from a Bollywood prism, somehow trying to compare songs etc, you loose your objectivity and probably need Bollywood detox
Recommend (0)
a Nov 13, 2016 02:15am
The first one was already terrible...who thought it was a good idea to make a sequel? I feel bad for Saba Qamar.
Recommend (0)
Naveed Nov 13, 2016 06:36am
Dear Author! Thanks for sparing me two precious hours of my life for something more valuable than watching this frivolous train of gibberish
Recommend (0)
Khan Nov 13, 2016 06:44am
The hero of this movie did not look like a hero. It would have been better if he was cast as a funny servant or driver in either of the lead pair's house.
Recommend (0)
Rebirth Nov 13, 2016 06:52am
At bookstores, there are entire sections of novels turned into soaps. These novel-based soaps brought global fame to the stars, who became popular all over the world with their shows beings dubbed in Arabic, while some even got roles in Turkey. The books are also best sellers as their covers have the very same stars to attract fans. However, there were no books that were made into films. No mystery novels, no historical ones, nothing. With so many books, literature festivals, writers, 'MA Urdu"s, it is surprising that the stories still turn out to be so bad. On the other hand, all other movie industries in the world, from H'wood (that often copies French films), Turkish, Iranian and Chinese have all benefitted from their indigenous authors, history, and even mythology. Pakistanis have so much history in their country and so many historical and scenic sites to film at, that they really don't need to stress the creative sides of their brains (which is clearly deficient).
Recommend (0)
Rebirth Nov 13, 2016 07:01am
Just Mughal and Sufi history alone can be good for a few dozen movies. Turks have made many movies and soaps based on Ottoman history and that with Atatürk, inside their palaces (Dolmabahce, Topkapi and others). Iranians have even made video games based on Persian mythology; these are just a few examples. Why, despite so many books, authors and literary geniuses, do Pakistanis still need to work on writing new scripts and dialogue? Even the cheapest and smallest book at any bookstore can be made into a pretty decent movie compared to whatever it is that they're showing us here. In fact, it'll also help the writing/literary scene flourish too. The reason H'wood is a global phenomon along with Netflix is the writers who have made a guild called the WGA. With so many clever brains in the form of writers (some are Pakistanis), producers simply need to search for the relevant genre to get the script and voilà. Only the acting could fail because the scripts being churned out are meticulous.
Recommend (0)
Akbar Nov 13, 2016 07:54am
Guys take it easy. It's a good 2 hours of laugh. Why do we have to so overly critical to ourselves. Thumbs up to all who were associated with the project. I watched it in Dubai with houseful audience on day 4 of its release. Script was powerful, witty, funny. Go watch it and don't kill it by reading this review
Recommend (0)
paxtani Nov 13, 2016 07:56am
@Rebirth because pakistani literature is not highlighted in showbiz... it's only to pass MAs. There are no ... nill.. nada... programs for kids on any chanels... so our children are not exposed to our own heritage in media.... when they grow up, they don't even know about all the treasure you refer to...
Recommend (0)
MEstillpakiStani Nov 13, 2016 09:13am
Film was good entertaining the whole time , we just watched it earlier this afternoon in one of Nj's theater , I don't really know what are you guys talking about!!
Recommend (0)
Riz Nov 13, 2016 09:24am
because of uninspiring character of yasir Husain, I will never ever go to watch this movies.. and the song in which saba qamar is playing guitar is so so copy paste shot that I cant imagine to see this ...
Recommend (0)
Sehrish Nov 13, 2016 03:59pm
Nice review. Well written and funny at times. For me, so was the film. Being an avid watcher of cinema, I do disagree with some of your points. For one, Behroz does mention towards the end that he was faking the illness just to get Moti to the Swat. I think you must have missed that part. And Kalabaaz Dil's video was not a copy of Kajra re. It was a copy of Ghargra :) Anyways, the film made me laugh more than a few times so not as bad as you've stated in your article.
Recommend (0)
Aamer Nov 14, 2016 11:34am
I saw this movie over the weekend, i must say it was a well made movie but not as good as the first part. Saba Qamar played her part well but i cant say the same about the male lead. He was so boaring and whenever he opened his mouth gave me a headache. I rather they hired the actor who played pan wala in the film he was much better looking. Behroze Sabzwari was good, Rubina Ashraf's part seemed very strong but messed up in the end. I was surprised with Atiqa Odho's guest appearance. If this is what she wanted she should have done Panjabi movies when she started in the 90's. Overall there was plenty of room for improvement.
Recommend (0)
Ghazala YaseeN Nov 14, 2016 03:38pm
This is really very good
Recommend (0)
Ghazala YaseeN Nov 14, 2016 03:39pm
It's really nice movie
Recommend (0)